|
Variety
a means of recovery.
To any but an old nurse, or
an old patient, the degree would be quite inconceivable to
which the nerves of the sick suffer from seeing the same walls,
the same ceiling, the same surroundings during a long confinement
to one or two rooms.
The superior cheerfulness
of persons suffering severe paroxysms of pain over that of
persons suffering from nervous debility has often been remarked
upon, and attributed to the enjoyment of the former of their
intervals of respite. I incline to think that the majority
of cheerful cases is to be found among those patients who
are not confined to one room, whatever their suffering, and
that the majority of depressed cases will be seen among those
subjected to a long monotony of objects about them.
The nervous frame really suffers
as much from this as the digestive organs from long monotony
of diet, as e.g. the soldier from his twenty-one years' "boiled
beef."
Colour
and form means of recovery.
The effect in sickness of
beautiful objects, of variety of objects, and especially of
brilliancy of colour is hardly at all appreciated.
Such cravings are usually
called the "fancies" of patients. And often doubtless
patients have "fancies," as e.g. when they desire
two contradictions. But much more often, their (so called)
"fancies" are the most valuable indications of what
is necessary for their recovery. And it would be well if nurses
would watch these (so called) "fancies" closely.
I have seen, in fevers (and
felt, when I was a fever patient myself), the most acute suffering
produced from the patient (in a hut) not being able to see
out of window, and the knots in the wood being the only view.
I shall never forget the rapture of fever patients over a
bunch of bright-coloured flowers. I remember (in my own case)
a nosegay of wild flowers being sent me, and from that moment
recovery becoming more rapid.
This
is no fancy.
People say the effect is only
on the mind. It is no such thing. The effect is on the body,
too. Little as we know about the way in which we are affected
by form, by colour, and light, we do know this, that they
have an actual physical effect.
Variety of form and brilliancy
of colour in the objects presented to patients are actual
means of recovery.
But it must be _slow_ variety,
e.g., if you shew a patient ten or twelve engravings successively,
ten-to-one that he does not become cold and faint, or feverish,
or even sick; but hang one up opposite him, one on each successive
day, or week, or month, and he will revel in the variety.
Flowers.
The folly and ignorance which
reign too often supreme over the sick-room, cannot be better
exemplified than by this. While the nurse will leave the patient
stewing in a corrupting atmosphere, the best ingredient of
which is carbonic acid; she will deny him, on the plea of
unhealthiness, a glass of cut-flowers, or a growing plant.
Now, no one ever saw "overcrowding" by plants in
a room or ward. And the carbonic acid they give off at nights
would not poison a fly. Nay, in overcrowded rooms, they actually
absorb carbonic acid and give off oxygen. Cut-flowers also
decompose water and produce oxygen gas. It is true there are
certain flowers, e.g. lilies, the smell of which is said to
depress the nervous system. These are easily known by the
smell, and can be avoided.
Effect
of body on mind.
Volumes are now written and
spoken upon the effect of the mind upon the body. Much of
it is true. But I wish a little more was thought of the effect
of the body on the mind. You who believe yourselves overwhelmed
with anxieties, but are able every day to walk up Regent-street,
or out in the country, to take your meals with others in other
rooms, &c., &c., you little know how much your anxieties
are thereby lightened; you little know how intensified they
become to those who can have no change;[1] how the very walls
of their sick rooms seem hung with their cares; how the ghosts
of their troubles haunt their beds; how impossible it is for
them to escape from a pursuing thought without some help from
variety.
A patient can just as much
move his leg when it is fractured as change his thoughts when
no external help from variety is given him. This is, indeed,
one of the main sufferings of sickness; just as the fixed
posture is one of the main sufferings of the broken limb.
Help
the sick to vary their thoughts.
It is an ever recurring wonder
to see educated people, who call themselves nurses, acting
thus. They vary their own objects, their own employments,
many times a day; and while nursing (!) some bed-ridden sufferer,
they let him lie there staring at a dead wall, without any
change of object to enable him to vary his thoughts; and it
never even occurs to them, at least to move his bed so that
he can look out of window. No, the bed is to be always left
in the darkest, dullest, remotest, part of the room.[2]
I think it is a very common
error among the well to think that "with a little more
self-control" the sick might, if they choose, "dismiss
painful thoughts" which "aggravate their disease,"
etc. Believe me, almost _any_ sick person, who behaves decently
well, exercises more self-control every moment of his day
than you will ever know till you are sick yourself. Almost
every step that crosses his room is painful to him; almost
every thought that crosses his brain is painful to him: and
if he can speak without being savage, and look without being
unpleasant, he is exercising self-control.
Suppose you have been up all
night, and instead of being allowed to have your cup of tea,
you were to be told that you ought to "exercise self-control,"
what should you say? Now, the nerves of the sick are always
in the state that yours are in after you have been up all
night.
Supply
to the sick the defect of manual labour.
We will suppose the diet of
the sick to be cared for. Then, this state of nerves is most
frequently to be relieved by care in affording them a pleasant
view, a judicious variety as to flowers,[3] and pretty things.
Light by itself will often relieve it. The craving for "the
return of day," which the sick so constantly evince,
is generally nothing but the desire for light, the remembrance
of the relief which a variety of objects before the eye affords
to the harassed sick mind.
Again, every man and every
woman has some amount of manual employment, excepting a few
fine ladies, who do not even dress themselves, and who are
virtually in the same category, as to nerves, as the sick.
Now, you can have no idea of the relief which manual labour
is to you--of the degree to which the deprivation of manual
employment increases the peculiar irritability from which
many sick suffer.
A little needle-work, a little
writing, a little cleaning, would be the greatest relief the
sick could have, if they could do it; these _are_ the greatest
relief to you, though you do not know it. Reading, though
it is often the only thing the sick can do, is not this relief.
Bearing this in mind, bearing in mind that you have all these
varieties of employment which the sick cannot have, bear also
in mind to obtain for them all the varieties which they can
enjoy.
I need hardly say that I am
well aware that excess in needle-work, in writing, in any
other continuous employment, will produce the same irritability
that defect in manual employment (as one cause) produces in
the sick.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Sick
suffer to excess from mental as well as bodily pain.
It is a matter of painful
wonder to the sick themselves, how much painful ideas predominate
over pleasurable ones in their impressions; they reason with
themselves; they think themselves ungrateful; it is all of
no use. The fact is, that these painful impressions are far
better dismissed by a real laugh, if you can excite one by
books or conversation, than by any direct reasoning; or if
the patient is too weak to laugh, some impression from nature
is what he wants. I have mentioned the cruelty of letting
him stare at a dead wall. In many diseases, especially in
convalescence from fever, that wall will appear to make all
sorts of faces at him; now flowers never do this. Form, colour,
will free your patient from his painful ideas better than
any argument.
[2] Desperate
desire in the sick to "see out of window."
I remember a case in point.
A man received an injury to the spine, from an accident, which
after a long confinement ended in death. He was a workman--had
not in his composition a single grain of what is called "
enthusiasm for nature"--but he was desperate to "see
once more out of window." His nurse actually got him
on her back, and managed to perch him up at the window for
an instant, "to see out." The consequence to the
poor nurse was a serious illness, which nearly proved fatal.
The man never knew it; but a great many other people did.
Yet the consequence in none of their minds, so far as I know,
was the conviction that the craving for variety in the starving
eye, is just as desperate as that of food in the starving
stomach, and tempts the famishing creature in either case
to steal for its satisfaction. No other word will express
it but "desperation." And it sets the seal of ignorance
and stupidity just as much on the governors and attendants
of the sick if they do not provide the sick-bed with a "view"
of some kind, as if they did not provide the hospital with
a kitchen.
[3] Physical
effect of colour.
No one who has watched the
sick can doubt the fact, that some feel stimulus from looking
at scarlet flowers, exhaustion from looking at deep blue,
etc.
|